Documents

math21-2012.pdf

Description
Description:
Categories
Published
of 468
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Share
Transcript
  Intermediate CalculusandLinear Algebra Jerry L. KazdanHarvard UniversityLecture Notes, 1964–1965  i Preface These notes will contain most of the material covered in class, and be distributed beforeeach lecture (hopefully). Since the course is an experimental one and the notes writtenbefore the lectures are delivered, there will inevitably be some sloppiness, disorganization,and even egregious blunders—not to mention the issue of clarity in exposition. But we willtry. Part of your task is, in fact, to catch and point out these rough spots. In mathematics,proofs are not dogma given by authority; rather a proof is a way of convincing one of thevalidity of a statement. If, after a reasonable attempt, you are not convinced, complainloudly.Our subject matter is intermediate calculus and linear algebra. We shall develop thematerial of linear algebra and use it as setting for the relevant material of intermediatecalculus. The first portion of our work—Chapter 1 on infinite series—more properly belongsin the first year, but is relegated to the second year by circumstance. Presumably this topicwill eventually take its more proper place in the first year.Our course will have a tendency to swallow whole two other more advanced courses,and consequently, like the duck in Peter and the Wolf, remain undigested until regurgitatedalive and kicking. To mitigate—if not avoid—this problem, we shall often take pains tostate a theorem clearly and then either prove only some special case, or offer no proof atall. This will be true especially if the proof involves technical details which do not helpilluminate the landscape. More often than not, when we only prove a special case, theproof in the general case is essentially identical—the equations only becoming larger.September 1964  ii Afterward I have now taught from these notes for two years. No attempt has been made to revisethem, although a major revision would be needed to bring them even vaguely in line withwhat I now believe is the “right” way to do things. And too, the last several chaptersremain unwritten. Because the notes were written as a first draft under panic pressure,they contain many incompletely thought-out ideas and expose the whimsy of my passingmoods.It is with this—and the novelty of the material at the sophomore level—in mind, thatthe following suggestions and students’ reactions are listed. There are three categories,A), Material that turned out to be too difficult (they found rigor hard, but not many of the abstractions), B), changes in the order of covering the stuff, and C), material—mainlysupplementary at this level—which is not too hard, but should be omitted if one ever hopesto complete the ”standard” topics within the confines of a year course.(A)  It was too hard   (unless one took vast chunks of time).(1) Completeness of reals. Only “monotone sequences converge” is needed for infiniteseries.(2) Term-by-term differentiation and integration of power series. The statement of the main theorem should be fully intelligible—but the proof is too complicated.(3) Cosets. This is apparently too abstract. It might be possible to do after findinggeneral solutions of linear inhomogeneous O.D.E.’s.(4)  L 2  and uniform convergence of Fourier series. Again, all I ended up doing was totry to state what the issues were, and not to attempt the proof. The ambitiousstudent should be warned that my proof of the Weierstrass theorem is opaque(one should explicitly introduce the idea of an approximate identity).(5) Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. The students simply don’t believe inequalitiesin such profusion.(6) I you want to see rank confusion, try to teach the class how to compute higherorder partial derivatives using the chain rule. That computation should be oneof the headaches of advanced calculus.(7) Existence of a determinant function. I don’t know a simple proof except for theone involving permutations—and I hate that one.(8) Dual spaces. As lovely as the ideas are, this topic is too abstract, and to myknowledge, unneeded at this level where almost all of the spaces are either finitedimensional or Hilbert spaces. One should, however, mention the words “vector”and “covector” to distinguish column from row vectors. I forgot to do so in thesenotes and it did cause some confusion.  iii(B)  Changes in Order and Timing  . The structure of the notes is to investigate barelinear spaces, then linear mappings between them, and finally non-linear mappingsbetween them. It is with this in mind that  linear   O.D.E.’s came before  nonlinear   mapsfrom  R n →  R . The course ended by treating the simplest problem in the calculusof variations as an example of a nonlinear map from an infinite dimensional spaceto the reals. My current feeling is to consider linear  and   non-linear maps between  finite   dimensional spaces before doing the infinite dimensional example of differentialequations.The first semester should get up to the generalities on solving  LX   =  Y   , p. 319[incidentally, the material on inverses (p. 355 ff) belongs around p. 319]. Moststudents find the material on linear dependence difficult—probably for two reasons:1) they are not used to formal definitions, and ii) they think they have learned atechnique for doing something, not just a naked definition, and can’t quite figure out just what they can do with it. In other words, they should feel these definitions aboutthe anatomy of linear spaces are similar to those describing a football field and of little value until the game begins—i.e., until the operators between spaces make theirgrand entrance.Because of time shortages, the sections on linear maps from  R 1 → R n and  R n → R 1 ,pp. 320-41 were regrettably omitted both years I taught the course. The notes werewritten so that these sections can be skipped.(C)  Supplementary Material  . A remarkable number of fascinating and important topicscould have been included—if there were only enough time. For example:(1) Change of bases for linear transformations (including the spectral theorem).(2) Elementary differential geometry of curves and surfaces.(3) Inverse and implicit function theorems. These should be stated as natural gener-alizations of the problems of a) inverting a linear map, b) finding the null spaceof a linear map, and c) generalizing dim D ( L ) = dim R ( L ) + dim N  ( L ) all tolocal properties of nonlinear maps via the tangent map.(4) Change of variable in multiple integration. Determinants were deliberately in-troduced as oriented volume to make the result obvious for linear maps andplausible for nonlinear maps.(5) Constrained extrema using Lagrange multipliers.(6) Line and surface integrals along with the theorems of Gauss, Green, and Stokes.The formal development of differential forms takes too much time to do here.Perhaps a satisfactory solution is to restrict oneself to line integrals and thesetheorems in the plane, where the topological difficulties are minimal.(7) Elementary Morse Theory. One can prove the Morse inequalities easily for thereal line, the circle, the plane, and  S  2 merely by gradually flooding these setsand observing the number of lakes and shore line changes only at the criticalpoints.

Ggwp

Oct 8, 2019

Geography

Oct 8, 2019
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x